Doc-u-menT

Project data

Tag philosophy

Automated Tagging & Scoping

Apply a tagging philosophy to scraped and imported tags: equipment types, descriptions, and which tagging procedure the tag follows.

  • KKS
  • ISA 5.1
  • RDS-PP
  • TIA-606
  • CSI
  • ISO 81346
  • DC Functional
Back to features

Scraping finds the characters on the sheet. This page is the philosophy that makes those characters useful. Auto-description reads the tag number against industry parsers and, where it can, fills a description and suggests system, subsystem, and equipment type.

Auto mode tries the libraries we ship and can pick a dominant standard across a spreadsheet. You can also lock to KKS, ISA 5.1, RDS-PP, TIA-606, CSI, ISO 81346, or DC Functional — or turn it off. It is productivity assistance with engineering sign-off still on you, not a claim that every tag is certified correct.

Philosophy, not just a pattern mask

A pattern says how many letters and digits. A standard says what those letters mean. KKS system and equipment codes, ISA 5.1 instrument letters, RDS-PP function and location segments, TIA-606 grid identifiers — each parser writes a description a completions team can actually read.

Review — Auto (ISA) descriptions and suggested hierarchy, still yours to accept.

What it does

  • ✓Auto-fill tag descriptions from the structure of the tag number
  • ✓Detect whether a tag follows Auto, ISA 5.1, KKS, RDS-PP, TIA-606, CSI, or ISO 81346
  • ✓Suggest system and subsystem when those columns are blank and the standard supports it
  • ✓Map KKS-style tags onto equipment type and subtype from bundled code tables
  • ✓Use drawing title and type from scrape to refine electrical and mechanical sheet context
  • ✓Lock to one standard, run Auto, or turn detection off per session
  • ✓Works fully offline — KKS tables are bundled, no lookup service required
  • ✓Applies after both PDF scrape and CSV/Excel import in the same review table
  • ✓Line and pipe identity is recognised before letter-standard parsers run

Highlights

  • • Seven parser-backed naming standards plus project-learned codes
  • • Auto can pick a dominant standard on a bulk import
  • • Descriptions and hierarchy suggestions stay editable in review
  • • Engineering judgement still signs the register off

Demo

Demo video coming soon

Related

See the rest of the platform, or talk to us about a demo.

All featuresRequest a demo